Practice

General Practice Q&A

Below you will find helpful Q&A listed by topic.

Teletherapy

Q: As an Oregon licensed psychologist, do I need a special certification to practice psychology via telehealth?

A: The Board does not require additional certification to practice teletherapy. If you choose to provide psychological services by electronic means, please review the relevant provisions of the American Psychological Association’s (APA) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Although training in teletherapy is not expressly required, you are required to have knowledge and competency in any area of practice, so training is recommended.

Q: I’m licensed as a psychologist in [insert other state] and have a patient who will be staying in Oregon for some time. Can I continue to provide them services via teletherapy?

A: This requires either a visitor’s permit or full licensure. Please review our Limited Permit webpage to see if this fits your situation.

Q: I’m licensed in Oregon but will be staying in [insert other state] for some time. Can I continue to provide teletherapy to my Oregon patients?

A: As a licensee/resident/permitted practitioner, you are legally authorized to practice with your patients who are within the State of Oregon via electronic means. However, please remember that state laws vary. It is up to the jurisdiction where you will be physically located to determine if this is acceptable, as Oregon cannot regulate practice in another state and cannot authorize psychology practice within another state.

Q: I’m licensed in Oregon but my patient will be traveling to [insert other state] for some time. Can I continue to provide teletherapy to this patient?

A: As a licensee/resident/permitted practitioner, you are legally authorized to practice with your patients who are within the State of Oregon via electronic means. However, please remember that state laws vary. It is up to the jurisdiction where your client will be physically located to determine if this is acceptable, as Oregon cannot regulate practice in another state and cannot authorize psychology practice within another state.

Q: I’m licensed as a psychologist in [insert other state] and I will be staying in Oregon for some time. Can I continue to provide services to my clients in [insert other state] via teletherapy?

A: Per OAR 858-010-0003, the Oregon Board of Psychology (OBOP) considers the practice of psychology in Oregon to include the provision of services to a client in Oregon or offering services to individuals in Oregon. OBOP does not prohibit psychologists licensed in other states from providing services to their out-of-state clients while the psychologist is physically located in Oregon. However, please remember that state laws vary. It is up to the jurisdiction where your client will be physically located to determine if this is acceptable, as Oregon cannot regulate practice in another state and cannot authorize psychology practice within another state.

PSYPACT

Q: Will Oregon Join PSYPACT?

A: The Board has been evaluating the potential benefits, challenges, and obstacles of joining the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PSYPACT) for some time. Those who have followed the Board’s public meetings know that PSYPACT has been a recurring topic of discussion for many years. In early 2024, the Board requested legislation to be introduced in the 2025 Oregon Legislative Session to adopt PSYPACT in Oregon. In early December 2024, the Board learned that its proposed legislative concept was not approved to move forward to be introduced during the 2025 Legislative Session. There has been a broader conversation about compact agreements across medical and professional licensure that have been coming up and the Governor was wondering if this would be better addressed in that broader conversation.

While this is not moving forward as Board-introduced legislation, it is still likely to be introduced in 2025 by other interested parties. We will be actively monitoring this during Session and providing feedback where needed.

Navigating PSYPACT includes several complex issues. One primary concern is that the compact’s model language conflicts with Oregon’s Constitution and statutes. These conflicts must be addressed in a way that upholds Oregon’s standards while allowing the Compact Commission to accept Oregon as a member. The Board has heard concerns about the potential lowering of competency standards in Oregon, as some states do not conduct nationwide criminal history checks or require one year of post-doctoral supervised work experience.

There are additional concerns about granting significant regulatory power to the Compact Commission, an external entity, and the logistical and financial implications of conducting out-of-state investigations. Implementing PSYPACT will involve substantial costs, including legal fees, additional personnel, necessary system updates, and loss of licensing fee revenue to an outside party, all of which may lead to increased licensing fees for Oregon psychologists.

While interjurisdictional practice compacts are often promoted as a way to increase the number of practitioners in Oregon, it’s important to remember that PSYPACT will also allow Oregon psychologists to practice in other states, leaving the overall impact on Oregonians uncertain. This is an important initiative that the Board is carefully monitoring, in collaboration with stakeholders, to avoid unintended consequences. Ultimately, the decision to adopt PSYPACT in Oregon lies with the Oregon Legislature and Governor.

Requests for Legal/Clinical Advice

Q: Can I get legal or clinical advice from the Board?

A: Oftentimes, the Board’s website or staff may be able to direct individuals to relevant information such as applicable laws, rules, ethical code provisions, or official guidelines. However, Board members and Board staff cannot provide legal or clinical advice. It is not the role of Board personnel to perform analysis of the law or to research clinical standards and provide advice on how those apply to a person’s specific situation. Such advice takes specific legal and/or clinical knowledge and extensive, time-consuming research and analysis work to ensure accuracy and consistency. There are significant implications of offering such advice; it affects the rights and responsibilities of the Board and the recipient of the advice. From a practical perspective, current resource and staffing levels would not allow for Board staff to respond to requests for legal and clinical advice from thousands of current applicants, residents, and licensees.

Psychologists, psychologist associates, residents, temporarily authorized practitioners, and applicants have a responsibility to read, understand, and follow the American Psychological Association’s (APA) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, and to adhere to applicable laws and regulations. A practitioner who encounters an area of uncertainty must take steps to follow an ethical decision-making model. This includes regularly reviewing statutes, administrative rules, and ethical code provisions to ensure a strong foundational understanding. Researching best practice as it applies to your situation and consulting with colleagues and/or legal counsel is also recommended. Clearly document the steps that you took in order to resolve your issue, including what you learned from research conducted and discussions held. Also, you are encouraged to check with your professional association, because many offer helpful advice services.

Board Decisions

Q: Can I reach out to a Board member if I don’t like a decision coming from the Board office?

A: It is not appropriate to contact individual Board members to attempt to lobby for a particular position, for example a policy opinion or a past or pending decision of the Board on a compliance issue. Board members are not able to speak as individuals about a Board matter or make any individual decisions outside of the full Board.

Q: Can I get an exception?

A: Oftentimes, the Board must render decisions or provide information that some individuals may find unfavorable. The Board is a governmental regulatory agency charged with setting certain standards and enforcing specified Oregon law. State agencies cannot set standards and then choose not to apply them to just some individuals or decide not to follow the rules or statutes established by the Oregon State Legislature. Such practices are not only unfair and arbitrary but are also illegal. The Board and its staff cannot grant variances to law, rule, or ethical code provisions. A somewhat common area of confusion is the expiration of licensure applications or lapsing of licenses for those who fail to complete the process. While Board staff do put forth significant effort to strengthen awareness through advisory articles, web materials, and courtesy reminders, licensees, residents, and applicants are personally responsible for understanding and fulfilling the requirements to achieve and maintain professional licensure in Oregon. Requests for exception to the administrative rules cannot be granted by the Board.

Q: Why won’t the Board to take a position on pending legislation that will benefit psychologists?

A: Many stakeholders are not aware of this, but the Governor’s Office requires that Oregon State agencies, including the Board, must not take a position on any legislation other than to support bills introduced by the Board itself or the Governor’s office.

Insurance

Q: Does the Board require licensees or residents to carry professional liability insurance?

A: No, the Board does not have any administrative rules or governing statutes that require any form of coverage. However, you may wish to consult with colleagues, a private attorney, or your professional organization for advice or guidance on what is the best approach for your situation.

Q: Can the Board answer my questions about insurance coverage issues?

A: No.

Advertising

Q: Can I advertise my business, service, program, or recruitment through the Board?

A: No. MHRA and the Board are government regulatory entities that only post information related to other agencies or official licensing or regulatory-related resources. We do not post advertisements, recruitments, or unofficial resources.

Statistics

Licensing

Compliance

Between 2019 and 2023, the Board did not deny any licensure applications because of a criminal conviction.