Q1: What is the Multnomah Fire District #10 rate?
Q2: Why is PERS so expensive? Will rates go down?
Q1: What is the Multnomah Fire District #10 rate?
Formed in 1947, Multnomah Fire District (MFD) #10 provided service to an unincorporated area of east Multnomah County
west of the Sandy River. Over time, other fire districts consolidated with MFD #10, including Gresham, Fairview,
Wood Village, Troutdale, and some of Portland. In the early 1980s, MFD #10 was the second largest fire department in
Oregon.
By 1983, growth in the area led to city annexations, which shrunk District #10. In 1984, MFD #10 was dissolved, and
its employees became members of Portland Fire and Rescue. However, this left behind a $70 million unfunded
liability.
In 2003, the legislature passed House Bill 2278, which included a resolution to pay off the debt over 25 years . MFD
#10 was allocated $50,000 of the outstanding UAL, which it paid in November 2003. Of the remaining UAL, the City of
Portland was apportioned a percentage and the remainder was charged to all Tier One/Tier Two employers in the
system. The cities of Gresham, Fairview, Wood Village, and Troutdale were required to pay twice the rate of other
employers.
The bill also clarified how future unfunded liabilities or surpluses would be handled when employers merge, split, or
transfer employees.
Current MFD #10 UAL rate
All employers who have Tier One/Tier Two employees pay the MFD #10 UAL rate. The MFD #10 debt will be part of the
PERS Tier One/Tier Two UAL rate until it is fully paid in December 2027.
Total MFD #10 UAL* | $102.4 million |
Rates for MFD #10 UAL* | City of Portland | 0.65% |
Cities of Gresham, Fairview, Wood Village, Troutdale | 0.16% |
All other Tier One/Tier Two employers | 0.08% |
*As of the December 31, 2022, valuation.
Note: If you would like to see how the rates were calculated, see page 43 of the
System-Wide Actuarial
Valuation.
Rules to prevent this happening again
The merger, dissolution, and consolidation of employers is now codified in
Oregon
Administrative Rule 459-009-0350. Employers must appropriately resolve outstanding liabilities before they
are approved to merge, dissolve, or consolidate, according to
Oregon Revised Statute 238.235. Employers
must also work with the PERS Employer Service Center and Actuarial Services to ensure all liabilities are
appropriately allocated.
The process for insolvent employers is outlined in
Oregon
Administrative Rule 459-009-0400.
Questions? Contact
Actuarial Services.
Q2: Why is PERS so expensive? Will rates go down?
Your PERS rate pays for your organization’s qualifying employees ’ future benefits. However, that is only part of the
equation.
Your rate also covers past debt, shared expenses of other employers in your employer pool, retiree healthcare
subsidies, and a transition liability (if your organization has a lower ratio of actuarial assets to actuarial
liabilities than those in your employer pool). Employees who receive a greater benefits package (e.g., Tier One
members and Police and Fire employees) incur a higher rate than other employees.
The portion of your rate that reflects the difference between the actuarial liability accrued for past service and
current actuarial assets (i.e., past debt) is called your unfunded actuarial liability (UAL). Employers’ UAL built
over time and will take time to eliminate.
It started with PERS’ first plan, Tier One. Created in 1946, Tier One provided a generous retirement package that,
over time, became too expensive to maintain.
In the mid-1990s, the Oregon Legislature took action to control PERS rising rates. The Legislature created Tier Two
for employees hired on January 1, 1996, and later. It had a slightly less generous benefits package, which helped
but didn’t go far enough.
In 2003, the Legislature added a third tier called the Oregon Public Service Retirement Plan (OPSRP). The structure
of the new plan continued to provide a strong benefits package, but it prevented some overly generous retirement
packages of the past (e.g., retirees earning more in retirement than they did while working).
Then in 2019, the Legislature passed Senate Bill (SB) 1049, which added programs designed to reduce employer rates.
The creation of OPSRP and the changes implemented by SB 1049 are working as intended. As Tier One and Tier Two
employees retire and the scales tip toward more OPSRP members, employer costs are going down. In fact, OPSRP
contribution rates are hovering around 9% to 10%. While some employers continue to pay rates as high as 25%, their
rates will decrease over time as their Tier One/Tier Two employees retire and OPSRP employees make up a greater
proportion of their workforce.
Learn more
To learn more about how PERS works and the benefits it provides, read
employer reporting guide 1
Overview of PERS.
Watch the video “How Does PERS Work?” to understand how the Oregon
government and employers work together to manage PERS.
To understand costs in your PERS invoice that you can control, read
employer reporting guide 28
How to (Potentially) Reduce Your Bill.
To learn about the rate-reduction programs implemented by SB 1049, read the
Rate-Relief Programs webpage.