Skip to main content

Oregon State Flag An official website of the State of Oregon »

Step 2: Goals & Objectives - Performance Standards

Performance Standards

Please note: Only cities and counties in metropolitan areas and Metro are required to follow this performance standards/targets setting process.

For cities and counties in metropolitan areas and Metro, OAR 660-012-0215 establishes requirements for transportation performance standards that cities and counties use to review comprehensive plan and land use regulation amendments provided in OAR 660-012-0060. If a city or county requires applicants to analyze transportation impacts as part of a development review in acknowledged local land use regulations, then that review shall include evaluation of the transportation impacts using the performance standards established in OAR 660-012-0215. This also applies to transportation performance standards that Metro uses to review functional plan amendments as provided in OAR 660-012-0060.Measure+Threshold=Standard_Local_Performance.jpg

OAR 660-012-0215(3) requires cities and counties within metropolitan areas and Metro to adopt at least two local transportation performance standards that collectively evaluate at least two of the following objectives for the transportation system, for any or all modes of transportation:

  • Reducing climate pollution – creating feasible transportation options or otherwise reducing driving in a way that reduces carbon emissions
  • Equity – consideration for existing or proposed transportation-related disparities and barriers experienced by historically marginalized communities
  • Safety – providing a transportations system that reduces injuries and fatalities and that people feel comfortable using
  • Network connectivity – modal networks that provide route options to users and minimize out-of-direction travel
  • Accessibility – the ease of reaching (and interacting with) destinations or activities distributed in space
  • Efficiency - the maximization of transportation services at the lowest possible cost
  • Reliability - dependably provides users with a consistent range of predictable travel times
  • Mobility - the ability to move freely and easily.

At least one performance standard must support increasing transportation options and avoiding principal reliance on the automobile. Collectively, the performance standards must also support achieving the performance targets discussed above. In addition to local governments, ODOT must also adopt at least two performance standards for their facilities within metropolitan areas.

Elements of a Performance Standard

Cities, counties, ODOT, and Metro shall establish the transportation performance standards to include these elements:

  • Characteristics of the transportation system that will be measured, estimated, or projected, and the methods to calculate their performance.
  • Thresholds to determine whether the measured, estimated, or projected performance meets the performance standard. Thresholds may vary by facility type, location, or other factors. Thresholds shall be set at the end of the planning period, time of development, or another time. Thresholds are key to establishing a performance standard. Without them, it is only a metric.
  • Findings for how the performance standard supports meeting the targets for performance measures set as provided in OAR 660-012-0910 (see Performance Measures for Reporting for more information).

Potential Performance Standards

The following table shows potential performance standards that are included in a toolkit in ODOT's Analysis Procedures Manual to help jurisdictions select performance standards to meet the requirements in rule 0215. Cities and counties may adopt performance standards not included in the toolkit. Those in the toolkit have been identified based on their ability to document incremental changes and their overall flexibility, ease of application and potential data availability. The table also identifies the OAR 660-012-0215(3) objectives that the potential performance standards could have a primary impact upon (the two adopted performance standards must collectively address two or more of these) and which potential performance standards would support increasing transportation options and avoiding principal reliance on the automobile (at least one must meet this criteria). Additional information on each of these potential performance standards is included in ODOT's Analysis Procedures Manual.

 Potential Standards included in the Toolkit
Related Objective Areas per OAR 660-012-0215(3)
Supports increasing transportation options and avoiding principal reliance on the automobile?
Accessibility to key destinationsAccessibility, Equity
Yes
Accessibility to employmentAccessibility, Equity
Yes
Accessibility to transitAccessibility, Equity
Yes
Bicycle level of traffic stress (BLTS)Accessibility
Yes
Pedestrian level of traffic stress (PLTS)Accessibility
Yes
System completenessNetwork Connectivity, Accessibility
Yes
Bicycle crash riskSafety
Yes
Pedestrian crash riskSafety
Yes
Walking and biking facility conditionAccessibility
Yes
Pedestrian crossing spacingNetwork Connectivity, Accessibility
Yes
Average daily traffic/capacityEfficiency, Mobility
No
Hours of congestion/Duration of congestionEfficiency, Reliability, Mobility
No
Automobile level of serviceEfficiency, Reliability, Mobility
No
QueuingMobility, Safety
No
Existing and predicted total crashesSafety
No
Travel speedEfficiency, Mobility
No
Vehicle hours traveled (VHT)Reducing Climate Pollution
No
Household-based vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capitaReducing Climate Pollution
No
Volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) at IntersectionsEfficiency, Mobility
No
V/C for roadway linksEfficiency, Mobility
No

When selecting performance standards, cities and counties should apply the following criteria:

  • Does the performance standard help support progress towards at least one of the OAR 660-012-0215(3) objectives? If so, which ones?
  • Does at least one of the performance standards support increasing transportation options and avoiding principal reliance on the automobile?
  • Can the city or county support the staff time or consultant time to report on the performance standard or review impact on the performance standard for transportation projects and land use and development applications?
  • Is the data available? If not, what is the work required to collect the necessary data?
  • Does the performance standard support progress towards the TSP goals and objectives and support achieving the rule 0910 performance targets? If so, which ones? Greater consideration could be given to performance standards that address multiple goals.
  • What will the thresholds be for the performance standard and will they create outcomes desired by the community?
  • What performance standards do partner and neighboring agencies use and is there a benefit in coordinating standards?
  • How will the two or more selected performance standards work together? Per OAR 660-012-0215(3), updated Transportation System Plans, “...must clearly establish how to apply the multiple performance standards to a proposal that meets some, but not all, of the transportation performance standards."

Which mode does the performance standard apply to? How does the performance standard impact people using different modes? For example, it may impact the objective area positively for one mode at the expense of other modes. Can performance standards be selected that move the objective areas in the same direction for all modes?




  We want to hear from you!Submit TSP Guidelines Feedback
Close Close